From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 24 13:49:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB9C16A4D0 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:49:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEBD43D5A for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:49:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC891997569 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:55:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 84537-05 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:55:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.98.207.149] (catv-5062cf95.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.207.149]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037C09974EB for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:55:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <426BA3E7.4080707@t-hosting.hu> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:49:27 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Subject: fsck in securelevel 2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:49:34 -0000 Hi, I tried to check the root partition with fsck and it found errors and for my greatest surprise, it answered its questions automatically with no. It is due to the securelevel 2? I've been thinking whether fsck uses direct access (which is denied by the securelevel) or not? Cheers, Gábor Kövesdán