Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 01:37:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-approval requested: [Bug 199872] devel/glib20 Apps using glib 2.42.2 crashing with 'pthread_mutex_lock' abort : [Attachment 189354] Proposed patch for options (since 453790 revision) Message-ID: <bug-199872-6497-HQ0CBZhsho@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-199872-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-199872-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
lightside <lightside@gmx.com> has asked gnome@FreeBSD.org for maintainer-approval: Bug 199872: devel/glib20 Apps using glib 2.42.2 crashing with 'pthread_mutex_lock' abort https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199872 Attachment 189354: Proposed patch for options (since 453790 revision) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D189354&action=3Dedit --- Comment #27 from lightside <lightside@gmx.com> --- Created attachment 189354 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D189354&action= =3Dedit Proposed patch for options (since 453790 revision) (In reply to comment #26) Need to note, that proposed (INOTIFY and KQUEUE) port's options allows to switch between gio/inotify and gio/kqueue (affected) implementations. I'm aware, that devel/libinotify port is for "Kevent based inotify compatible library" (i.e. also uses kqueue; see comment #11). Possible to clarify descriptions for port's options.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199872-6497-HQ0CBZhsho>