Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 22:03:30 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 270098] www/grafana9: Grafana wrongly reported as not running due to procname Message-ID: <bug-270098-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270098 Bug ID: 270098 Summary: www/grafana9: Grafana wrongly reported as not running due to procname Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: dominik@banoviez.com CC: drtr0jan@yandex.ru Flags: maintainer-feedback?(drtr0jan@yandex.ru) CC: drtr0jan@yandex.ru Created attachment 240733 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D240733&action= =3Dedit Patches the rc.d script with the correct procname (Patch attached.) After starting Grafana, running service grafana status or service grafana s= top will say grafana is not running.=20 This happens because rc.d checks that=20 1) the pidfile exists 2) the process id in the pidfile is running 3) the proccess name matches either the command, or procname After Grafana switched to a unified binary, grafana-server is a wrapper for "grafana server". The procname should therefore be set to %%PREFIX%%/bin/grafana instead of %%PREFIX%%/bin/grafana-server so rc.d pro= cess name check succeeds. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-270098-7788>