From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 28 15:52:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7809216A4CE for ; Fri, 28 May 2004 15:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFF0943D31 for ; Fri, 28 May 2004 15:52:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 86592 invoked from network); 28 May 2004 22:51:44 -0000 Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 28 May 2004 22:51:44 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 17:51:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Bosko Milekic In-Reply-To: <20040526203431.GA17806@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20040528174723.I9659@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20040526203431.GA17806@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network buffer allocations: mbuma, PLEASE TEST X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 22:52:25 -0000 On Wed, 26 May 2004, Bosko Milekic wrote: > Hi, > > If you're running -CURRENT, please test this: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mbuma2.diff > > It is several extensions to UMA and mbuf & cluster allocation > built on top of it. Sounds good in theory, but I'm too lazy to test it. The m_getcl changes looked ok to my quick read of the patch, but I didn't look through the mbuma implementation at all. Mike "Silby" Silbersack