From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 18:27:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4773916A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:27:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A879D43D54; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:26:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32748490648; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:26:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35200-07; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:26:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-46-91.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.91]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE691490647; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:26:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1CAE373BC; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:26:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E44371E1; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:26:47 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:26:47 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Don Lewis In-Reply-To: <200409271718.i8RHIsrP032923@gw.catspoiler.org> Message-ID: <20040928152545.X57211@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200409271718.i8RHIsrP032923@gw.catspoiler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: keramida@linux.gr Subject: Re: what is fsck's "slowdown"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:27:01 -0000 On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Don Lewis wrote: > On 24 Sep, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> Just curious as to whether or not this is going to get applied to the >> source tree ... ? Just checked my -current, and it isn't there yet, just >> wanted to see if maybe its been forgotten? :( > > There are a couple of tweaks that I want to do. My plan is to re-post > the patch to current@ for further testing before I commit it. After it > has had time to be sufficiently exercised in -CURRENT, I'll MFC it to > RELENG_5 (after 5.3-RELEASE), and RELENG_4. The feedback I've gotten > from those who reviewed the patch has been positive, but I want to take > it slow because of the critical nature of fsck. Cool to both points ... especially the MFC back to 4 :) Once its there, I'll definitely do an upgrade on our servers, since that will significantly reduce our downtimes :( Thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664