Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:05:17 -0500 (CDT) From: Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> To: Bradley Oedithipus <bradley@lightstep.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: natd/ipfw/sshd problem. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109252104110.47372-100000@cody.jharris.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0109251830230.2320-100000@lightstep.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Bradley Oedithipus wrote: [snip] > lightstep:~ # ipfw -a l > 00050 1933 595146 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ed0 > 00100 19894 995402 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00250 108 6213 allow tcp from 10.0.0.0/8 to 66.100.232.202 143 > 00300 23 1260 unreach host tcp from any to 66.100.232.202 143 > 00500 17 972 unreach host tcp from any to 66.100.232.202 139 > 65000 40851 7434737 allow ip from any to any > 65535 27 1801 deny ip from any to any > lightstep:~ # > > I have no options passed to natd Yes, natd is running. Yes, I can > access everything from the inside to the outside regardless of the > ipfw rules (must be open tho) BUT, in order to access the outside from > the subnet (not the server) the divert rule shown above MUST be in > place exactly as it is. That is why i dont think that i am blocking > ports. If i was blocking port 22, nmap (from a remote machine) would > at least show that port 22 was being filtered. But it doesnt, it > doesnt show it at all. This is a tad wierd. Does ftp or telnet or anything else work from the outside. Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> - Keep on Routing in a Free World... "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0109252104110.47372-100000>