Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:35:17 -0700
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Initial NFS Test: Linux vs FreeBSD (769% slower)
Message-ID:  <E76233B3-E5F6-4647-8E29-724138716037@hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <1394524226.1234372.1367271192522.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
References:  <1394524226.1234372.1367271192522.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 2013-04-29, at 14:33 , Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:

>> 
>> Okay, if I'm reading the above right … there doesn't look to be *alot*
>> of difference between the Before n After … it doesn't look like its
>> downing a whole lot of NFS ops … am I reading wrong?
>> 
> Yep. Taking the difference between before and after I see:
> Getattr 66, Lookup 11, Access 11 for a total of 88 RPCs
> 
> That is "no load" on an NFS server.

That agrees then with what I got from the NetApp tech also … his expectation when we started looking into this (I looked at NetApp as being the problem first) was that he'd see high GetAttr calls, but we didn't …

Let me play with the other things next …

Thanks ...


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E76233B3-E5F6-4647-8E29-724138716037>