From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 28 14:51:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA00797 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:51:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nanguo.chalmers.com.au (gateway.chalmers.com.au [203.1.96.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA00154 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:48:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@chalmers.com.au) Received: from chalmers.com.au (carbon.chalmers.com.au [203.1.96.26]) by nanguo.chalmers.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA12492 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:46:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <36B0ECEB.5AA38F20@chalmers.com.au> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:04:11 +1000 From: Robert Chalmers Reply-To: robert@chalmers.com.au Organization: chalmers.com.au X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: zh-CN,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd Subject: Next Question. Which is better. 64K ISDN, or 56K/33.6 POTS ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >From a webservice point of view, which is better. ISDN, or 56/33.6 Modem over POTS. with PPP on both. Given the network congestion these days, it seems to me there is not a lot of advantage in going to 64K ISDN, especially given its cost in Australia. What do others think. Is there a solid technical reason for going to ISDN? yes? no? I have a gut feeling that ISDN may be a waste of money. thanks for any opinions on this. -- http://www.chalmers.com.au. Publications From China in 24 different languages. English, French, German, Russian, Arabic, Spanish, Chinese, Burmese, Bengali, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Persian, Swahili, Sinhalese, Thai, Tamil, Urdu, Vietnamese. China Books for CIBTC, Beijing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message