Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:27:16 -0500 From: "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227207 - in head/sys: netinet netinet6 Message-ID: <2494F45C-AEEA-43D6-B373-AACF747A09B6@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <86r51lcyn2.fsf@kopusha.home.net> References: <201111061047.pA6AlKnc017568@svn.freebsd.org> <86r51lcyn2.fsf@kopusha.home.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 Nov 2011, at 05:51, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 10:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Mikolaj Golub wrote: >=20 > MG> Author: trociny > MG> Date: Sun Nov 6 10:47:20 2011 > MG> New Revision: 227207 > MG> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227207 >=20 > MG> Log: > MG> Cache SO_REUSEPORT socket option in inpcb-layer in order to = avoid > MG> inp_socket->so_options dereference when we may not acquire the = lock on > MG> the inpcb. > MG> =20 > MG> This fixes the crash due to NULL pointer dereference in > MG> in_pcbbind_setup() when inp_socket->so_options in a pcb returned = by > MG> in_pcblookup_local() was checked. > MG> =20 > MG> Reported by: dave jones <s.dave.jones@gmail.com>, Arnaud = Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> > MG> Suggested by: rwatson > MG> Glanced by: rwatson > MG> Tested by: dave jones <s.dave.jones@gmail.com> >=20 > This commit fixes the panic reported by Dave for 9.0 triggered by > named. Robert has helped very much suggesting the solution and looking > at the patches. Unfortunately being saturated on free time he > couldn't do thorough review of the final version confirming only that > presumably the approach was correct. >=20 > I made an effort to check that there was no regression and = SO_REUSEADDR > worked the same way as it had worked before. But I can't be 100% = confident > that I haven't broken something. Because of this I am going to MFC > only after the release. >=20 > Here is the initial discussion of the issue: >=20 > = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2011-September/029858.html Hi Mikolaj: In light of some additional reports of races reminiscent of this one = (i.e., the UDP crash report on net@ a few days ago), I wonder if we = should change plans and attempt to get this in the release? I'm sorry I = haven't had a chance to do a more thorough review, and will try to get = to that later this week now that my current batch of meetings is winding = down. Robert=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2494F45C-AEEA-43D6-B373-AACF747A09B6>