From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 12:01:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A2516A405 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheffo@FreeBSD-BG.org) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (blah.sun-fish.com [217.18.249.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D20913C44B for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cheffo@FreeBSD-BG.org) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4DD1B10EE9; Mon, 14 May 2007 14:01:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hater.cmotd.com (hater.cmotd.com [192.168.3.125]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876531B10EE0; Mon, 14 May 2007 14:01:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46484F91.4020803@FreeBSD-BG.org> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:01:21 +0300 From: Cheffo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandr References: <46443103.9010008@otel.net><17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031602018EFA@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> <46483584.70608@FreeBSD-BG.org> <017f01c79614$dbae6420$0200a8c0@ssoniccp3pvd> In-Reply-To: <017f01c79614$dbae6420$0200a8c0@ssoniccp3pvd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on BLAH Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, ivo tasev Subject: Re: 6.2 Stable + Mysql 5.0 poor performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:01:23 -0000 Alexandr wrote: >> Do you need more info? > > I think you should look at this > http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/mysql.html > > What exactly you suggest ? :) Increasing thread_concurrency from 8 to 16 brings me worst results (I have only 4 cores not 8, and this is supposed to be CPUs*2 ) Or I miss something else from this post ? BTW I'm using 4BSD scheduler not ULE (big improvements in ULE are in 7.x right?) -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177