From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 24 21:20:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721F010657E3 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hanche+bounces@math.ntnu.no) Received: from anne.math.ntnu.no (anne.math.ntnu.no [129.241.15.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AC2B8FC12 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13705 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 21:20:50 -0000 Received: from gauss.math.ntnu.no (HELO localhost) (hanche@129.241.15.102) by anne.math.ntnu.no with ESMTPA; 24 Nov 2010 21:20:50 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:20:48 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20101124.222048.659699273738821617.hanche@math.ntnu.no> To: pav@FreeBSD.org From: Harald Hanche-Olsen In-Reply-To: <1290631269.51249.25.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <4CED33DC.9040508@FreeBSD.org> <20101124.192744.2220537215686514264.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <1290631269.51249.25.camel@hood.oook.cz> X-URL: http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/ X-Mailer: Mew version 7.0.50 on Emacs 24.0.50 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, ljrittle@acm.org Subject: Re: ports/152499: Redirections in es may take effect in the shell itself X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:20:53 -0000 + Pav Lucistnik : > Harald Hanche-Olsen píše v st 24. 11. 2010 v 19:27 +0100: > > + Pav Lucistnik : > > > > > Can you try adding this line to port Makefile and see if that works? > > > > > > CFLAGS:= ${CFLAGS:N-O*} > > > > Yes, that works. (Once I realized that I had to put it at the end, > > after .include .) > > No it's supposed to be above inclusion. > > Do you perhaps define your own CFLAGS in make.conf? No, I don't. But now that I try it again, putting it above the inclusion, it works as it should. I guess I must have mistyped the line on my first attempt. - Harald