From owner-cvs-all Sun Oct 8 11: 9:36 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519CD37B503; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B4BAB1C6B; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 14:09:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 14:09:11 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: "Brian F. Feldman" Cc: Akinori MUSHA , imp@village.org, alex@big.endian.de, asami@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT avail Message-ID: <20001008140911.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200010081745.e98Hjm512990@green.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200010081745.e98Hjm512990@green.dyndns.org>; from green@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 01:45:47PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 01:45:47PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > That reminds me: can we blow away the cruft sooner rather than later? Since > everything is repo-copied, what is the reason that we should still keep the > old junk from the old ports format? I can understand if it's to sort out > any issues in the near future... Everyone's local repository needs to reflect the death before it can be repo zapped, otherwise CVS has a fit. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message