From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 26 17:44:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26FC106566B for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9F58FC15 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so2926643qyk.13 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:44:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kOC9tZ6aMo1ffBuh/urBwJ5qQrpBrBqpcdtg7hlUivc=; b=FGkBBpQz9tH4BjtGGVfMC/E7ykJ9WxleD4eyL3HefRj6kiqK2Wa5ekRAEZ09BgoDEd zzlt7w87TrPbWLnKY7+BCiiMTQp55HRChOKqEpsaF29qoYPtuvzlkqtbbGEfY9xT0xCW unR/dRr7zks35qKghy+3u1fdrvQdbGLsvSq1M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.64.80 with SMTP id d16mr1841229qci.169.1314380676773; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.19.131 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:44:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:44:36 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:44:38 -0000 On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: ... > I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, > right? A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. -Garrett