Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:50:52 -0800 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, "tech-misc@netbsd.org" <tech-misc@netbsd.org>, "Kernel@dragonflybsd.org" <Kernel@dragonflybsd.org> Subject: RE: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file Message-ID: <20171215175047.EAF1818C@spqr.komquats.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why is the family tree still in base? Shouldn't it be in doc? --- Sent using a tiny phone keyboard. Apologies for any typos and autocorrect. Also, this old phone only supports top post. Apologies. Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> or <cy@freebsd.org> The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. --- -----Original Message----- From: Lyndon Nerenberg Sent: 15/12/2017 09:35 To: Eitan Adler Cc: FreeBSD Hackers; tech-misc@netbsd.org; Kernel@dragonflybsd.org Subject: Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file > I'd like to turn this into into a dot file Sounds like a reasonable idea. With care, the source (text) file(s) can=20 often be formatted in a way that's at least semi-readable. I assume this=20 would ship with pregenerated images (PDF, SVG) so people don't have to=20 install the port to render the graph? --lyndon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171215175047.EAF1818C>