From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 5 10:04:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935CEDFFEC1 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092003084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.3.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25BA673D68 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=omjKailUnrKRs9/yOmWe0VeSAiXrKglC+1EdWihcabk=; b=OmrA1GiehTA1vvwfj2DBwsWoBrMwuAltLLsltLq0P1NjQoJCd3AplYUgF0RCZIQPNxCnCh880uKjbxnpZqCTbDLy9Mydh8Kt6+9BEY+HH0QfGhKAmATQkvksyFiR//wHuLmNIYhVo0WrZnnHmd7ivUGE9mbjPFcDyWgTedzHo/okZTXT1y3nC8Ti1GrcOIiPKM04xCa/klKpTpYkHiOX+ecOofm7YInDVxK6lLKsfqEsZzXILh4cmjgHemT8dxpSdiEjs780U4t7OKnsX8oSAQoizhOJVm44AvHprEjbOQHk1sOgJ4CFdRXu1+UNvCSK2AKzkKVyGA4uFahZebq57Q== Received: from CY1NAM02FT055.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.74.59) by CY1NAM02HT033.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.75.70) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.20.282.5; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:04:39 +0000 Received: from BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (10.152.74.53) by CY1NAM02FT055.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.74.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.282.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:04:38 +0000 Received: from BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([10.172.31.146]) by BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([10.172.31.146]) with mapi id 15.20.0282.012; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:04:38 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: 'FreeBSD' Subject: RE: CUDA under FreeBSD Thread-Topic: CUDA under FreeBSD Thread-Index: AQHSRBqtvFEsc8UCT2qJ64Hb8jzu0wJQdBGLoyRSb7A= Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:04:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <34331.107.77.207.211.1512384505.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <0545699d-9df7-ced2-4990-27e3ecb8e531@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <0545699d-9df7-ced2-4990-27e3ecb8e531@ShaneWare.Biz> Reply-To: FreeBSD Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:15C2646866AA9E15796E2183C8C42E1509262B59736B1D4F93E7681DF535C120; UpperCasedChecksum:AC11E1A1F7AC0FC1776C5FBC195F323553D21C1A8D75D7FF8A50E9A8EB33C9EC; SizeAsReceived:7069; Count:47 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [2aw958ALyNCHP/Q3e2nmhwqwG3iqAFcl] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1NAM02HT033; 6:f8uE1OAQdeQmUekSVsnYpr7BDlmwoZFNpdM9kYgTwxbDDyYtuv38JvPgoGstg5jIL3sfZJDOWbAUHvFbo9DKyIB5qriEBk77usJ5w+xFCJVkuMHz0+ye+Lw7KJRCoJYlWYJ0RIA8tH6C1WQEiCvZ0hiFLK4t+KWyDB+KNDt7Z6S/aJmj0Cr9/AeMc3mDYTWeQ9XnVyx8KOdXdUb0tf0lvpYU00PDMsGwXLEHFFug7K5Oyv953ZYhR262A6cDvpaLIREXWZRx40E5JW2XgqEz95mCH72haVG5xX9BVa74WhykB+yvZdvTNwUNms7QnEN+8UMGNjuUF8hHS/8aUcEah9ODUaqbQ4FaxPvwhdfVPsA=; 5:/teiLSHZNnkHg77r5iyQit8t+2VbPOoD0MPd/XK058H3tXxqSNO/VvasKHdalP2bjHfukbNgN7wByAMJaPHGjIZXLVPEeZsB5USC/oki5lUBr4dEwQMS0jL20FmTn1gCHlkRRTeuGkpcEn6EZdDIGvmRxkOrt0YE2HZ7Q6jH+Lc=; 24:9rHG/H5qQn424v3JkQ92RyEw4T/1229srgukdyVxWBxrlFr3rt5YkUjzgxSKo9Rk/zTMqasSiU6qMfDD9+PhzZ3lv3gWEQRG2OI91n28GcY=; 7:tDApkS/EnjtFQaf2AY1kxmctVMt4drvnSk2W7CyJUTP/NNTHZHLXiImZ5uxqGmFEBQcNj/w66SUO3BwnPS+olxzR6hjqABFpwF6ZZ1dHRY4w+grcUJ/q5NZSEB+MqwdRkDLjZg6oTf1QQK1ThmVGRuDVxZfrmzn+WxtrwisLclHtzlYzOxn6z58yuyuVIgom8TCfeUklMWHZjVPg/JS+D4GR5wYTBeaO6olfzci6Os0qo8GCYyilLwhVTQnXM3OJ x-incomingheadercount: 47 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:CY1NAM02HT033; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY1NAM02HT033: x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bd7dd35f-4655-48b1-4827-08d53bc79839 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:CY1NAM02HT033; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:CY1NAM02HT033; x-forefront-prvs: 0512CC5201 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1NAM02HT033; H:BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=lO46kCFZ6rJRAP=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bd7dd35f-4655-48b1-4827-08d53bc79839 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Dec 2017 10:04:38.8089 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1NAM02HT033 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 10:04:41 -0000 --=-=lO46kCFZ6rJRAP=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday, December 5, 2017 2:53 AM, Shane Ambler stated: > On 04/12/2017 21:19, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote: > > On Mon, December 4, 2017 4:24 am, Carmel NY wrote: > >> Out of morbid curiosity, I was wondering if anyone could tell me the > >> real reason that Nvidia does not support CUDA under > > > > Arrogance would be my guess. >=20 > The morbid part is that they give us the linux libcuda, so we should be a= ble to > run linux binaries that use cuda, just not native apps. >=20 > >> FreeBSD? Also, what are the realistic expectations for it getting > >> supported shortly? > > > > Zero is my estimate. The way to let one's steam about them is just not > > to buy ther hardware. Their attitude to open sourse and unwillingness > > to disclose details of their hardware was always much worse than that > > of their competitors (ATI/AMD, matrox...). > > > > This is just my opinion based on my subjective observations. Personally, I have always considered Nvidia products to be superior. > I'm sure on an episode of bsdnow, they mentioned asking an nvidia dev at > one of the conferences and they said there shouldn't be any technical > reason, it just isn't enabled in the build and they would look into it. > Still hasn't helped any. Interesting. I was not aware of that. It would seem to me that there should= be more of an=20 concerted effort to get this issue resolved. --=20 Carmel --=-=lO46kCFZ6rJRAP=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEh3rFs7ZCOM581rwKjsagALPkYOsFAlombyAACgkQjsagALPk YOvv/Af/WyAp4iApFvc5RPjsjfzuxlpWyMb+I8ANriHgMQu5xrqMPaqb6Y2NYO1E EeDvtX7NwXROUXm9D3j/Qt6fXJC0NjuOwy8hRefEq63UAitrfFqymXWtT8f6Jzp/ nF+bPgdsYd6yqG8mzmg8QY/enKSYFSAhEzKdVU2GYZK+jAygx+bClxu7qejpcN8L keGJoN/jaY5/fLqQtmdCMl9Hvzv7uFbH4racJGW9rfiHb8BMefFUGD5PIvHNhUuF FwO3rYMZuV977ooknI/1p1vRn8yqufEaB+f4+bFZeWRirvvDBEnY6OaT+MjsfvOL pnHNgvJv4M538dqRFMHGkJwfkj9xBg== =/vsK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=lO46kCFZ6rJRAP=-=--