Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:16:25 +0200 From: infoomatic <infoomatic@gmx.at> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: M2 NVME support Message-ID: <7b4fde24-e9e9-a372-7801-d6cc624167ab@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <a0c12351e21588a8e767988e1367ae9f@ramattack.net> References: <a0c12351e21588a8e767988e1367ae9f@ramattack.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I have not had problems so far on ~ 10 different server systems (entry level; supermicro, HP, ibm), as well as ~ 5 different workstations (HP, but also Asus, Gigabyte mainboadrs) and ~ 5 different notebooks (HP, Lenovo, Samsung) with ~ 10 different SATA models and ~ 5 different NVME models. Currently writing from a workstation with 2 NVME disks GIGABYTE GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD + PNY CS3030 1TB SSD and 4 different SATA disks: Patriot Burst Elite 1920GB, Crucial/Micron Client SSDs - MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA, Crucial/Micron Client SSDs - Crucial_CT525MX300SSD1, Crucial/Micron Client SSDs MTFDDAK512TBN-1AR1ZABHA. I have no performance data since it is adequatly fast and worked out of the box. NVME disks usually are less power-hungry and faster. Regards, Robert On 13.04.23 13:25, egoitz@ramattack.net wrote: > Hi!, > > > We are in the process of buying new hardware for use with FreeBSD and > ZFS. We are planning whether to buy M2 NVME disks or just SATA SSD disks > (probably Samsung PM* ones). How is you experience with them?. Do you > recommend one over the another?. Is perhaps better support from some of > them from a specificic version to newer?. Or do they perhaps work better > with some specific disk controller?. > > > Best regards, >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7b4fde24-e9e9-a372-7801-d6cc624167ab>