From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 05:10:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A0137B401; Thu, 22 May 2003 05:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E9143FAF; Thu, 22 May 2003 05:10:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost.jpj.net [127.0.0.1]) by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h4MCA7Fg052760; Thu, 22 May 2003 08:10:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)h4MCA6AH052743; Thu, 22 May 2003 08:10:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 08:10:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Trevor Johnson To: Tilman Linneweh In-Reply-To: <20030522101602.GA32104@huckfinn.arved.de> Message-ID: <20030522062336.O48018@blues.jpj.net> References: <200305212345.h4LNjSNf068849@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030522101602.GA32104@huckfinn.arved.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/evilwm Makefile ports/x11-wm/openbox X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 12:10:21 -0000 Tilman Linneweh wrote: > If you don't have the time to handle PRs for 6 months (evilwm) and 8 months > (openbox), you should consider removing yourself from MAINTAINER. I think of it the opposite way--that dumping a port with open PRs onto someone else is not a good thing. I have been mulling over dropping some other ports, but I am still interested in these two. I am humbled to realize that you believe ports@freebsd.org does better maintenance than I, and are willing to say so in public. There must be many others who hold the same opinion of me, but have kept quiet. Have you ever waited a year, two years, or longer for PRs you've sent to be committed? A change that I proposed in June of 2000 was just made this month, for instance. I am used to this, but even so my patience has at times run out and I've acted like a dork (hello, billf). Lately I try to keep in mind that others may also have things going on in their lives besides their work with FreeBSD. > Marking the ports FORBIDDEN, just because you don't have time, is not appropriate > IMHO. I believe it is more appropriate than offering the user a port of some code that only its author has looked at. This simply warns the user of that fact. > Please back this out. Of course I hope to back out these changes once I have read the code in question. Thank you for pointing out my failure as a contributor to FreeBSD. I am trying to do better. -- Trevor Johnson