From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 10:42:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA0816A454 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2748543D45 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x3so426208nzd for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:42:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LOaKQ7mQbUxUkqz+Mu+tlISPYp2kbecknEsQSDd0kGzSHIAbM3O7vLVorlbOt7/YGKxZIGgdLZ84hN9S5Ql2AbPXm/PHzNHao528IlgTadG5m0TbZr80x4D084/yXy26t9LVf++vxHaQgrwPMl750VCl1QF/rgIEYCEbPMd3+hQ= Received: by 10.36.10.17 with SMTP id 17mr128643nzj; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.20.34 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:42:35 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051028050719.D60E.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200510271904.17908.ringworm01@gmail.com> <20051028050719.D60E.GERARD@seibercom.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Re[2]: portupgrade stale dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:42:39 -0000 On 10/28/05, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > Personally, I feel that portmanager does a much better job of updating > without the problems that seem to crop up so often using portupgrade. > I've always been scared off by the comparatively young age of portmanager. Besides, portupgrade comes with a set of useful tools, like cvsweb browser. But the fat ruby dependency and some other things make me want something else. I'd be glad to see a perl-based ports management system. Maybe I'll write one some day :-)