From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Oct 13 23:05:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA25364
          for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs)
Received: from gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (root@gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com [207.113.159.21])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA25344
          for <bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from gdonl@tsc.tdk.com)
Received: from sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (root@sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.191])
          by gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id XAA04238; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.194])
	by sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA29596;
	Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gdonl@localhost)
	by salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA19338;
	Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com>
Message-Id: <199710140604.XAA19338@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:04:52 -0700
In-Reply-To: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
       "Re: FreeBSD TCP stack and RST processing [subj changed]" (Oct  1,  7:29pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 alpha(3) 7/19/95)
To: dg@root.com, Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD TCP stack and RST processing [subj changed]
Cc: bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Oct 1,  7:29pm, David Greenman wrote:
} Subject: Re: FreeBSD TCP stack and RST processing [subj changed]
} >} Its ok to look for
} >} an ACK when in SYN_SENT on RST's coz thats what is expected, and if you
} >} get other than expected and drop then its no big deal unless you can force
} >} a remote freebsd system to send out (pure) SYN's to non-connected
} >} ports, unlikely.  I  only have the snippets posted to the list available, but 
} >} based on them I'd say remove the case SYN_RECEIVED that was added.
} >
} >That's what I did in my local source tree.
} 
}    ...and that's the way -current is as of a few minutes ago. I'll merge the
} fix into 2.2-stable in a day or two.

It looks like this change never made it into 2.2-stable (or 2.1-stable).

There's another change a few lines further down in tcp_input.c that was
made about a week ago in the 2.1-stable and -current trees, but not in
2.2-stable.

			---  Truck