Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 02:11:30 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Subject: Re: Partition (Slice) tables Message-ID: <39E34DC2.573C7635@newsguy.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10010101512120.47405-100000@login-1.eunet.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marius Bendiksen wrote: > > Regarding the earlier discussion on slice tables, I would like to add that > there is a legitimate reason for the BIOS to demand a valid slice table. I > know a number of manufacturers look for a special partition type entry for > their suspend-to-disk feature. This recently came to my renewed attention, > as the IBM ThinkPad series now suspend to a partition type 165 (0xA5). Stupid idiot bastards! -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@linux.bsdconspiracy.net the ants all left because mtn. dew is sold out again To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39E34DC2.573C7635>