Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 02:37:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204494] [PATCH] sysutils/mdf2iso: mark UN'BROKEN (fetchable) Message-ID: <bug-204494-13-I2eQ4OoILU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-204494-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-204494-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494 --- Comment #8 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to matthew from comment #7) > Chris: > > No objection to you adopting the port. I was happy to see someone step up > and put some effort to ensuring ongoing availability of distfiles. The > sources I found could disappear tomorrow. > > However, I also must question the change of version. The version should > reflect and actual change to the functional state of the software. Merely > changing the location where a project resides is not a change to the > software itself and not a reason to change the version number. Repackaging > in .tar.xz with same version number as part of moving and modernizing should > be no issue, bump the portrevision if needed but not portversion. Save the > version bump for wen you have made a change to the software. It could > probably use a bit of cleanup after all these years. Good advice, Matthew. I'll revert the PORTVERSION, and bump PORTREVISION as a better reflection of the changes, and update the svn diff in reflection of those changes. Thanks, Matthew! --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204494-13-I2eQ4OoILU>