From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Apr 16 00:48:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA24721 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.serv.net (mx.serv.net [199.201.191.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA24702 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MindBender.serv.net by mx.serv.net (8.7.5/SERV Revision: 2.30) id AAA08992; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.HeadCandy.com (michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1]) by MindBender.serv.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA04872; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199704160747.AAA04872@MindBender.serv.net> X-Authentication-Warning: MindBender.serv.net: Host michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Thomas Arnold cc: Doug Russell , Chuck Robey , Stephen Roome , Dave Alderman , hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 15 Apr 97 23:46:25 -0400. Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:47:38 -0700 From: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Doug Russell wrote: >> Oh... By the way. Has anyone done any benchmarks on the K6 chips under >> FreeBSD yet? If not, let me know what tests you all want done on one, [...] >Gee. Ask and ye shall receive! [K6-166 only stats deleted] That's nice, but can you post a competative comparison against something else? The stats do nothing for me all by themselves. Thanks. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... -----------------------------------------------------------------------------