From owner-freebsd-multimedia Mon Jan 19 21:51:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA05502 for freebsd-multimedia-outgoing; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:51:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA05494 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:51:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA00799; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:51:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199801200551.VAA00799@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: dmaddox@scsn.net cc: Michael Imor , multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Poor Performance from Linux RealPlayer In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jan 1998 00:54:18 EST." <19980119005418.44652@scsn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 21:51:27 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org One thing to consider is that the RealPlayer is a product and that we don't have access to their code. It is a little different for publicly available programs where we can rectify or improve the code whenever we can . In the case of the RealPlayer the responsibility clearly falls on the company and even if the XFree86 group provides the functionality it is still up to the company responsible for the product to take advantage of functionality such as an interface to hardware assist scaling. Amancio