From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 25 00:54:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEDF16A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:54:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avscan2.sentex.ca (avscan2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6333043D39 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:54:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.sentex.ca [127.0.0.1]) by avscan2.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3P0st15083897; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:54:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from avscan2.sentex.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (avscan2.sentex.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 83453-06; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:54:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by avscan2.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3P0ssBq083872; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:54:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3P0skMt065310; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:54:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:54:00 -0400 To: Kris Kennaway From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050424175543.71041.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com> <20050424151517.O68772@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at avscan2b cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:54:54 -0000 At 08:04 PM 24/04/2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Performance in other areas seems to be lagging as well. > >Since you were wrong about the above, I have to ask whether you have >evidence of this. There was a lengthy discussion along with bonnie, dd, postmark and iozone results discussed in January on the freebsd-performance list that illustrate the disk io difference between RELENG_4 and RELENG_5 at the time. I also tried a CURRENT snapshot then and there wasn't much of a difference between it and RELENG_5. ---Mike