From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 16:37:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7826516A41F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:37:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB9943D5A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:37:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 7EB913134F; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:37:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:37:02 -0400 (EDT) From: user To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: creating snapshot capable ufs2 filesystems _after the fact_ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:37:03 -0000 I was just looking at the man page for newfs, and the new "-n" option ... basically if you newfs with -n, a .snap directory is not created in the new filesystem, and thus that new filesystem will not support snapshots. Does this mean that if I simply `mkdir .snap` in the root of a filesystem that suddenly it is snapshot capable ? That is to say, is that .snap directory simply a plain old directory, and having a ufs2 filesystem support or not support snapshots is only dependent on simply having that directory in place ? Or is there more to .snap and to the -n option ?