From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 19 10:01:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9930106564A; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7D08FC22; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from [85.173.16.182] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Jbv78-000Ca2-81; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:01:42 +0300 To: Roman Divacky References: <96317980@ipt.ru> <20080319002713.700848FC1E@mx1.freebsd.org> <20080319090956.GA21624@freebsd.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:01:13 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20080319090956.GA21624@freebsd.org> (Roman Divacky's message of "Wed\, 19 Mar 2008 10\:09\:56 +0100") Message-ID: <19519382@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 7.0, fedora-8 and "kernel: linux_sys_futex: unknown op 129" X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:01:44 -0000 On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:09:56 +0100 Roman Divacky wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 08:27:09PM -0400, Gary Stanley wrote: > > At 08:17 PM 3/18/2008, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > >Hi! > > > > > > > > >I see some kernel messages "kernel: linux_sys_futex: unknown op 129" > > >when launching print/acroread7 with emulators/linux_base-f8 (soon will > > >appear at ports) and compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 at 7.0-RELEASE. > > > > > >Nothing seems to be broken but I don't like such messages. ;-) > > > > > >Is it hard to emplement one? Thanks! > > > > Try this to silence them. They appear to be harmless for now. > I'll commit a patch that silences this as it is really harmless... Yes, it will be great, thanks. And what about implementing the unknown linux_sys_futex 128-129? Is it hard/real? The op no 128 is used many times. Actually, linux-firefox is cycled on op 128 and is not launched. WBR -- bsam