From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Aug 13 9:37:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F46A37B624 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 09:37:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: from holly.dyndns.org ([208.191.149.190]) by mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0FZ800DAHOKLTZ@mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net> for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 11:31:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA43360; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 11:31:13 -0500 (CDT envelope-from chris) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 11:31:12 -0500 From: Chris Costello Subject: Re: 2 inetd's with 2 nics In-reply-to: <004401c00543$50c661a0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> To: Leif Neland Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chris@calldei.com Message-id: <20000813113112.A41275@holly.calldei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.4i References: <004401c00543$50c661a0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday, August 13, 2000, Leif Neland wrote: > Is it possible and a good idea to have one inetd for the inside nic and > another with fewer services for the outside on a gateway machine, > or should I just use ipfw/ipchain for this? From the inetd man page: -a Specify a specific IP address to bind to. Alternatively, a host- name can be specified, in which case the IPv4 or IPv6 address which corresponds to that hostname is used. Usually a hostname is specified when inetd is run inside a jail(8), in which case the hostname corresponds to the jail(8) environment. -- |Chris Costello |If a group of N persons implements a COBOL compiler, there will be N-1 |passes. Someone in the group has to be the manager. -- T. Cheatham `---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message