From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 16 13:36:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9747616A512 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:36:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-15.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.50.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2586143D53 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:36:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from [172.16.0.12] (helo=localhost) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1BaaYw-000JD0-GV; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:34:49 +0200 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:34:46 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) To: Pav Lucistnik From: Oliver Eikemeier In-Reply-To: <1087391447.41656.13.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/67970: ports textproc/libxml, textproc/libxslt: bogus dependencies on devel/pkgconfig X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:36:20 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > V st, 16. 06. 2004 v 14:58, Oliver Eikemeier p=ED=9Ae: > >> the .pc file in the base and add libdata/pkgconfig to the mtree = files, >> especially since there are more ports that have problems with that. > > Adding libdata/pkgconfig to mtree sounds like a good idea. Depends how > broad mtree should be, that depends on portmgr's vision. Yep. otherwise a simple INSTALLS_PKGCONFIG=3Dyes would do the trick,=20 although it seems like we would only exchange a single line in pkg-plist with one in the Makefile in this case. >> OTOH you seem to selectively ignore the other samples given, which = does >> not seem very wise to me either. I can not understand why you have = such >> an emotional relation to a plainly wrong dependency. > > I talked with you on the subject extensively on IRC yesterday, and > you're firmly rooted in your believes and opinions. No reason to = repeat > whole conversation over email again. True, and I aborted the discussion because it got emotionally heated. I submitted the PR in the hope of starting a more technically oriented discussion, like getting some examples of breakage when this dependency would be removed. I'm a little disappointed of the lack of real = arguments in this thread. Most of my questions remain unanswered, like whether you believe devel/valgrind, devel/pcsc-lite, print/freetype2, graphics/png, www/neon, www/openvrml, x11/XFree86-4-libraries and x11-toolkits/qt33 should run-depend on pkgconfig too. -Oliver