From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 12 06:39:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976C416A4BF for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 06:39:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889E243F75 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 06:39:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1668965260; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:39:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 50585-02; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:39:03 +0100 (BST) Received: by arginine.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1078) id A52DC65240; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:39:03 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:39:03 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Marko Zec Message-ID: <20030912133903.GS44087@spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bruce M Simpson , Marko Zec , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <200309121505.15651.zec@tel.fer.hr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309121505.15651.zec@tel.fer.hr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: SPC cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New snapshot: network stack cloning / virtualization patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:39:06 -0000 Hi Marko, On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:05:15PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote: > Network stack cloning patches allow for multiple fully independent network > stacks to simultaneously coexistst in a single FreeBSD kernel. Combined with [snip] Your work is most interesting. I look forward to using it as a resource from which to learn when researching a prospective policy routing implementation for the 5.2 line of development, after the locking work has been finished. Have you considered porting your work to 5.x, perhaps as a Perforce project? Regards BMS