From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 18 15:59:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F149616A40F for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:59:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mx3.netclusive.de (mx3.netclusive.de [89.110.132.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B472913C448 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:59:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (p3EE21983.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [62.226.25.131]) by mx3.netclusive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007A4604133 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:59:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 58FF715213; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:59:20 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:59:17 +0100 Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1169135960 37229 192.168.100.5 (18 Jan 2007 15:59:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:59:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Subject: Re: Does Firefox run on the SPARC64 port of FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:59:27 -0000 Michael Johnson wrote: > Firefox only runs on >= 601101 sparc64. I am guessing that means a special revision of the UltraSPARC II processor, but I don't really know, because google gets a lot of hits, mainly explaining all sorts of soft that seems to have the same problem, but none of these hits really explain the meaning behind this. So even though this is getting a little OT: In English, please! Regards Chris