From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 2 13:43:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD22A37B401 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 13:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0979B43FD7 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 13:43:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (scratch.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.3]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h42KhYM7016128; Fri, 2 May 2003 13:43:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200305022043.h42KhYM7016128@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 13:43:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: marcus@marcuscom.com In-Reply-To: <1051903332.568.37.camel@gyros> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: More on the blkfree panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 20:43:43 -0000 On 2 May, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > This panic started happening to me after I cvsup'd and rebuilt > yesterday. Prior to that I never had the problem with a -CURRENT from > 04/26 (using the same steps listed below). Now I can reliably reproduce > the crash on: > > FreeBSD bulgogi.cisco.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #2: Fri May 2 > 14:08:06 EDT 2003 > marcus@bulgogi.cisco.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BULGOGI i386 I haven't seen it on my 4/26 machine, though I haven't done anything disc intensive (other than the daily cron jobs) since then. The reports of this problem started showing up on 4/27, so I went hunting for commits during the likely window using cvs diff. There were a number of vm locking changes made during that time, including some changes to vfs_bio.c. That's about as close as anything came to touching the filesystem code.