From owner-cvs-sbin Fri Sep 29 13:19:14 1995 Return-Path: owner-cvs-sbin Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA00734 for cvs-sbin-outgoing; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 13:19:14 -0700 Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA00714 ; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 13:19:04 -0700 Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA19932; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:18:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:18:30 -0400 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" Message-Id: <9509292018.AA19932@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: Mark Murray Cc: "Garrett A. Wollman" , "Justin T. Gibbs" , "Andrey A. Chernov" , CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin Makefile In-Reply-To: <199509292011.WAA22433@grumble.grondar.za> References: <199509292011.WAA22433@grumble.grondar.za> Sender: owner-cvs-sbin@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > Right now we have two wrongs making a right. We _have_ to have a make > with no MAKE_EBONES to make the clean distribution, followed by a nasty > hack to make the tainted distribution. Why can we not have "make > distribution" do it properly the first time? Sure we will need to fix > the make files, but that can of worms has been brewing for a while... Not everyone's build environment is based on `make release' and `make distribute'. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant