From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Sep 3 22:17:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA29252 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 22:17:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from banshee.cs.uow.edu.au (banshee.cs.uow.edu.au [130.130.188.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA29247 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 22:17:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ncb05@banshee.cs.uow.edu.au) Received: (from ncb05@localhost) by banshee.cs.uow.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA19655; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 15:16:12 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 15:16:09 +1000 (EST) From: Nicholas Charles Brawn X-Sender: ncb05@banshee.cs.uow.edu.au To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Better SNR suggestion for the mailing lists In-Reply-To: <2543.904882634@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org While we're on the subject, would it be possible to make the subject's of posts to various freebsd-* lists be something like: Subject: [freebsd-chat] Re: Better SNR suggestion for the mailing lists Several mailing lists I am on do this currently and it makes reading mail that little bit easier. Nick -- Email: ncb05@uow.edu.au - http://rabble.uow.edu.au/~nick Key fingerprint = DE 30 33 D3 16 91 C8 8D A7 F8 70 03 B7 77 1A 2A "When in doubt, ask someone wiser than yourself..." -unknown To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message