From owner-cvs-all  Mon Oct 26 17:57:24 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA23272
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 17:57:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from jkoshy@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA23260;
          Mon, 26 Oct 1998 17:57:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkoshy)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 17:57:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Joseph Koshy <jkoshy>
Message-Id: <199810270157.RAA23260@hub.freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/tet Makefile 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:38:49 PST."
             <199810260838.AAA05993@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk



>>>> "sa" == "Satoshi Asami" writes:

sa> I don't understand this Makefile at all.

sa> ?  (No need for the -d test either, rm -rf won't error out on
sa> non-existent directories.)

You're right.

sa> What is "post-clean"?

An experiment that crept in unnoticed.

sa> Also, you should just make TET_ROOT a compilation option unless
sa> there's a very good reason not to do so.  The spirit of ports
sa> collection is to have a "canned" configuration that is easy to use,

I'll look into this.  Some of the publically available test suites
that use TET (eg:- the Opengroup POSIX96 suite) install under $TET_ROOT 
and have specific requirements for $TET_ROOT;  moderately large amounts of 
disk space being one of them, a r/w permissions for non-root uids being
another. 

Koshy
<jkoshy@freebsd.org>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message