From owner-freebsd-afs Wed Nov 1 13:32:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org Received: from hurlame.pdl.cs.cmu.edu (HURLAME.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.189.78]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34D537B4C5 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:32:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from magus@localhost) by hurlame.pdl.cs.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eA1LW7s30161; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 16:32:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from magus) To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org Cc: port-freebsd@central.org Subject: FreeBSD porting for OpenAFS From: Nat Lanza Date: 01 Nov 2000 16:32:07 -0500 Message-ID: Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The OpenAFS mailing list I mentioned earlier now exists. Information about it and archives can be found at: http://lists-openafs.central.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/port-freebsd I imagine that actual development and implementation traffic would be more suited for port-freebsd, while freebsd-afs would be more suitable for usage stuff. For those so inclined, there is also a port-netbsd list at central.org; I forget who's working on that, though. Also, working with Tom Maher's changes, I've started trying to wrap my head around the OpenAFS build system. It's not pretty. Fortunately, alpha_dux40 is BSD-like enough that it works as a base to crib things from. --nat -- nat lanza --------------------- research programmer, parallel data lab, cmu scs magus@cs.cmu.edu -------------------------------- http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~magus/ there are no whole truths; all truths are half-truths -- alfred north whitehead To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-afs" in the body of the message