From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 08:59:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6792F16A4CE; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:59:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D8143D45; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:59:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2HGxOGs092877; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:59:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2HGxHUQ092876; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:59:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:59:17 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040317165917.GA92743@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200403170818.i2H8IFYU008824@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040317112344.GB86662@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040317114028.GA62685@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040317114028.GA62685@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Gerald Pfeifer cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc34 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:59:26 -0000 On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 03:40:29AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Do you have additional bsd.port.mk patches in your tree? Not on this FreeBSD/i386 machine -- I try very hard to keep it a clean, virgin reference system. I'm testing a build on it again. > The comment > in your commit log about bsd.port.mk now using a different default > value of CONFIGURE_TARGET seemed odd to me - there were patches > proposed to change this, but they were never committed because they > broke a lot of ports. Actually they were committed. :-) ---------------------------- revision 1.398 date: 2002-02-21 18:24:20; author: obrien; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3 Fix the default CONFIGURE_TARGET to one that is a proper GNU tuple. Approved by: several portmgr members ---------------------------- -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)