From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 20 5:23:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C665A37B401; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 05:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.129.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F5C43FAF; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 05:23:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105]) by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01E016758A; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:22:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from kiste.my.domain (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2KDNRue017746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:23:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) From: Michael Nottebrock To: Jens Rehsack , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: No xvideo support for ATI Rage Pro? Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:23:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Paul Murphy , Heinrich Rebehn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org References: <3E797D1F.8070807@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20030320123818.GA15027@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3E79B877.70106@liwing.de> In-Reply-To: <3E79B877.70106@liwing.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_PDce+trxdQi0NON"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200303201423.27103.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Boundary-02=_PDce+trxdQi0NON Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 20 March 2003 13:47, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > Isn't the Rago Pro a different card than the Rage 128 Pro? > > Sometimes, sometimes not ... Definitely different, and not just sometimes. :) The RagePro chipset is muc= h=20 older than the Rage 128 Pro. =2D-=20 Regards, Michael Nottebrock --Boundary-02=_PDce+trxdQi0NON Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+ecDPXhc68WspdLARAvXpAKCKTP0lLHt/PszSO0IogO6Aht6hPwCfeeNG ocuaWaTHRYZy99j6AXTFKjM= =lTCY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_PDce+trxdQi0NON-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message