From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 29 10:45:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B8D16A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:45:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from csmisc91.cs.chalmers.se (csmisc91.cs.chalmers.se [129.16.225.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF66D43D45 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:45:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lennart@augustsson.net) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1])iBOAXWEd001079; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:33:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41CBF07C.3040108@augustsson.net> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:33:32 +0100 From: Lennart Augustsson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041004 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Dillon References: <41CB38A7.5020700@vicor.com> <200412240430.iBO4UVMl050469@apollo.backplane.com> In-Reply-To: <200412240430.iBO4UVMl050469@apollo.backplane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: usb@freebsd.org cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: USB vendore designations.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:45:35 -0000 I would nnot consider the expanded definitions as progress. I would not apply the patch. I'm of the old school that thinks that even a few kB are worth saving. :) -- Lennart Matthew Dillon wrote: > :Lennart, Matt, Barry, USB hackers, > : > :On FreeBSD we have added vendor descriptiosn fo teh form > :XYZ electrical corp. > : > :where on NetBSD the same ID may be described as "XYZ" > : > :Is there a reason to go one way or the other? > :I'd rather not be different for no reason, but I'm loath to > :just discard information. > : > :thoughts? > > Well, the expanded definitions could be defined as 'progress', so I'd > probably stick with them and maybe submit a patch back to NetBSD to > bring NetBSD in synch with the better names. > > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > >