Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 22:30:23 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, imp@village.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2 Kernel Unstable Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970318222815.215p-100000@thelab.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <199703190212.MAA20865@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Mar 1997, Michael Smith wrote: > If the faults are 100% reproducible, with identical stack backtraces each > time, then it might be possible to either locate the memory address > that's faulty or locate the bug (if it's a bug). > Actually, I wasn't looking at it as so much of a bug, as a change of how the OS was handling acknowledged buggy hardware...I mistakingly thought that maybe something changed between the Feb 7th (approx) code and the current code...but you are most likely right, so I'll just drop it *shrug*
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970318222815.215p-100000>