From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 10 12:16:53 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 781092CA
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:16:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E54099E
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:16:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8ACGrJg073937
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:16:53 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 193511] revive net/tcptraceroute-devel and request maintainership
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:16:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-193511-13-W7TK4Tmezo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-193511-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-193511-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:16:53 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193511

John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|net/tcptraceroute-devel     |revive
                   |[req maintainer] REVIVE     |net/tcptraceroute-devel and
                   |STAGE MASTER_SITES WWW      |request maintainership

--- Comment #2 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
Rework title to avoid "[]" abuse.

In general, don't mention every little thing the PR does.  We don't care. 
Mention the 1 or 2 big ticket items.  In this case, revival and maintainership
request are the two big items, and the maintainership request really isn't very
important either.  You could just mention "revive" and the port name and that
would be sufficient.

On titles, more is not better.
(This has been bugging me for a while)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.