Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 01:18:11 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: interactive ports Message-ID: <199510050818.BAA00760@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
How many of these ports are suitable for packaging? This is the list of ports with IS_INTERACTIVE set and NO_PACKAGE not set. audio/xmcd/ comms/ecu/ comms/hylafax/ comms/mgetty+sendfax/ emulators/wine/ games/xtetris/ japanese/* (I'll deal with these) lang/STk/ lang/guile-ii/ lang/smalltalk/ mail/procmail/ math/xlispstat/ net/tkWWW/ (I know about this one) news/trn/ print/dvips/ print/mltex/ print/xdvi/ x11/emu/ x11/xgrab/ If it's unsuitable for packaging because it has compiled-in hostnames and such, please let me know, and I'll add NO_DEPENDS to it. Also, how many of these that don't fall in the catogory above, can have a reasonable package built by ``yes | make package'' or ``yes "" | make package''? Thanks Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510050818.BAA00760>