From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jun 2 1:53:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from vindaloo.allsolutions.com.au (vindaloo.allsolutions.com.au [203.111.24.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C8A37B51F for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 01:53:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from David_May@allsolutions.com.au) Received: from ASPerth1.allsolutions.com.au (aspns.internal [192.9.200.250]) by vindaloo.allsolutions.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA31947; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 16:52:48 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from David_May@allsolutions.com.au) Received: by ASPerth1.allsolutions.com.au(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.2 (600.1 3-26-1998)) id 482568F2.0030CCC2 ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 16:53:01 +0800 X-Lotus-FromDomain: ALL SOLUTIONS From: "David May" To: Vikash Badal * Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <482568F2.0025839E.00@ASPerth1.allsolutions.com.au> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 16:52:58 +0800 Subject: RE: [Q] PPP and Windows NT RAS? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Further info: * DES libaries are installed on the FreeBSD machine and PPP was compiled from source with DES support. * CHAP authentication is requested by remote peer and acknowledged by my side. * The authname/authkey have been confirmed by the NT administrator but I cannot check that myself. The part of the CHAP response (E=691 R=1) is returned the remote peer. A search on this found a Linux PPP FAQ at One interesting point in the FAQ is where it says that the user account name may need to be prefixed by an NT domain name . I.e. authname should be "domain\account" instead of just "account". I cannot check this right now. Has anyone found this to be the case? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message