Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 06:04:03 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc completeness Message-ID: <20120528200403.GB15356@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: <20120528195542.GB85856@hades.panopticon> References: <20120527140541.GL2987@hades.panopticon> <20120528094427.GE2675@aspire.rulingia.com> <20120528195542.GB85856@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-May-28 23:55:42 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote: >* Peter Jeremy (peter@rulingia.com) wrote: > >> >2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro >> >- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with >> >this (old) branch. >>=20 >> Another con: "make delete-old" on -current takes about 2 orders of >> magnitude longer to run than on 8.x. I would prefer to see some >> effort put into speeding it up before it was backported. > >Is that really a reason while it is still under 4 seconds and is not >usually run more often than updates (which take minutes if not hours)? My experience is that it now takes about 2=BD minutes on 10.x with warm caches, compared to less than 1 second on 8.x. For most of that time, there's no output and there's no warning of the increased time. I actually wrote about the poor performance here a couple of weeks ago. --=20 Peter Jeremy --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/D2jMACgkQ/opHv/APuIfh/QCdFKUYlCnwMx3QGX653bSGbw9x izIAmwbi/lc0szVLTaREuqG9zfH4mgGW =/B0w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120528200403.GB15356>