From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  7 20:15:50 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D081065673
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  7 Feb 2011 20:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru)
Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net
	[95.108.130.94])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAC08FC1A
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  7 Feb 2011 20:15:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (smtp11.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.67])
	by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9B2B96E6887D;
	Mon,  7 Feb 2011 23:15:47 +0300 (MSK)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail;
	t=1297109747; bh=VjDe+xqWqgEoz9wEkYKgtvBgfuYrWUr2+68dByAuQEI=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:
	In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=hcDnbyCVCsDYU5FKoDLQf4gpl5fY4mHXg0Ia/NHso+lemX5h5PZJSQmJcsDmBuZeO
	+JMoEFmd5ZTTSqbRLIBh0F8479n0OjDmgHcxdg3a1Km4RSvo7fsWopxk+21q6hpEXN
	yxcog1v3S5RjrpP148TxzsN19FsgC39YrykRNSts=
Received: from smeshariki2.local (unknown [178.76.212.172])
	by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 5C8F34CC009D;
	Mon,  7 Feb 2011 23:15:47 +0300 (MSK)
Message-ID: <4D5052A9.9000009@yandex.ru>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:14:33 +0300
From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU;
	rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110106 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bf1783@gmail.com
References: <AANLkTikgqxBoTmvek0hHmbXtyeWCAKyJCHScGvgZY4x-@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikgqxBoTmvek0hHmbXtyeWCAKyJCHScGvgZY4x-@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: How to not use OPTIMIZED_FLAGS properly
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:15:50 -0000

07.02.2011 22:28, b. f. пишет:
>>>
>>> Have you tried CFLAGS+=-O0 as portlint suggested?
>>
>> As i said before i tried that. If i'm using +=-O0 then it changes to -O2
>> -pipe. If i'm using =-O0, then all builds fine, but this make portlint
>> complaining.
>
> CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS are already passed by default in do-configure, as
> portlint states.  Why aren't you simply defining them, by themselves
> and not as a part of CONFIGURE_ENV, in the port Makefile?:

Yes. I get it wrong what Konstantin and portlint are said. Sorry.
CFLAGS=-O0 out of CONFIGURE_ENV works just fine. Thanks.

>
> CFLAGS+=-O0
>
> This seems pessimistic, by the way.  Have you tried adding other
> compiler flags, like those to control the compiler's memory usage? Or
> using another compiler via USE_GCC, or patching the source code?
>
> b.

Yes, i tried different flags that affect gcc memory usage, but w/o any 
success. I'm actually started from patching source code - removing 
optimization flags from distribution Makefiles.

-- 
Regards,
Ruslan