Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:00:03 +1030 From: Wayne Sierke <ws+freebsd-questions@au.dyndns.ws> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnomemeeting still marked as forbidden but culprit ports fixed? Message-ID: <1079631002.682.452.camel@ovirt.dyndns.ws> In-Reply-To: <1079629344.682.406.camel@ovirt.dyndns.ws> References: <1079629344.682.406.camel@ovirt.dyndns.ws>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Apologies for previous post; finger trouble in evolution... On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 03:32, Wayne Sierke wrote: > As I was updating my ports I got gnomemeeting failing as forbidden with > a reference to: > http://people.freebsd.org/~eik/portaudit/27c331d5-64c7-11d8-80e3-0020ed76ef5a.html > > which says: > > Affects: > * pwlib <1.6.0 > * asterisk <=0.7.2 > * openh323 <=1.12.0_2 > Well, I was about to say that the ports versions of openh323 are at 1.12.0_3 and pwlib at 1.6.0 but when I just went to generate the version text to copy into this message, now I'm only seeing pwlib at 1.5.0_4, so I'm not sure what happened (probably I mis-read the 5 for a 6). The other part of the query was that I couldn't find a dependency of gnomemeeting on net/asterisk (asterisk is still at 0.7.2), but that seems to be moot now although I'm still interested to hear suggested techniques for discovering dependencies, ie. how could I confirm a requirement for asterisk by the gnomemeeting port? If the answer to that is something like: portupgrade -Rn the next question is: how do the -n and -f switches interact (since the port is actually installed I need to use -f, does -n override everything? I guess the alternative is to deinstall gnomemeeting first.) Sorry for the noise.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1079631002.682.452.camel>