From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Oct 12 15:36:17 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6059D15019
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 15:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org)
Received: (from mwlucas@localhost)
	by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA46342;
	Tue, 12 Oct 1999 18:35:58 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mwlucas)
From: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
Message-Id: <199910122235.SAA46342@blackhelicopters.org>
Subject: Re: 3.5-stable ?
In-Reply-To: <000301bf14f5$9efbac20$2200000a@after.pw2.within.org> from "Sameer R. Manek" at "Oct 12, 1999  2: 6:15 pm"
To: manek@quadrunner.com (Sameer R. Manek)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 18:35:58 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > Well, in 2.2.5-release we had a nice little note in the release
> > announcement:
> >
> <SNIP>
> 
> 3.0 had many problems but they've been ironed out for the most part
> there are some issues with nfs, though I have yet to see them.

You know that, and I know that.

Clients like the little piece of paper.  Especially when I bill
hourly, and they've been burned by a variety of MCSEs.  ;)

==ml



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message