From owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 24 23:59:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A67F9EC; Fri, 24 May 2013 23:59:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rewt.org.uk) Received: from hosted.mx.as41113.net (hosted.mx.as41113.net [91.208.177.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CAAA9B; Fri, 24 May 2013 23:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.9.23] (bella.stf.rewt.org.uk [91.208.177.62]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rewt.org.uk) by hosted.mx.as41113.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3bHPgz0xNhzkT; Sat, 25 May 2013 00:59:27 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <519FFECD.8060905@rewt.org.uk> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 00:59:09 +0100 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juli Mallett Subject: Re: Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite works multi-user with -CURRENT. References: <20130520110659.1d1d2165@zeta.dino.sk> <20130520164001.5f7d99b8@zeta.dino.sk> <20130520172508.087daf7b@zeta.dino.sk> <20130523070225.4d9a3a59@zeta.dino.sk> <519DA801.2090205@rewt.org.uk> <20130523075537.37e4bcba@zeta.dino.sk> <20130523134206.69ea6994@zeta.dino.sk> <07C411D8-C5D3-4CD4-896B-844F6514C3DF@bsdimp.com> <519E5CFD.7060008@rewt.org.uk> <519F9377.60904@rewt.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Aleksandr Rybalko , "freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 23:59:30 -0000 Juli Mallett wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Joe Holden wrote: >> Looks like theres a couple of modifications and seemingly a bunch of missing >> cavium specific bits which presumably is their licensed sdk rather than the >> public one. > > I don't believe so. The cavm-executive* file in the GPL tarball > contains most Cavium-specific code. Then ubnt-platform* contains > support for IPSec offload. And so on. (I decided to just download > another copy and dig through it a little.) > >> Can't see if they do anything different in the available files, but you'll >> probably be able to spot it straight away :) > > You had mentioned you saw something related to the Atheros PHYs, but I > don't see it — am I missing it? > there is a kernel message on boot that alludes to a custom phy driver, but it isn't present in the gpl source. >> http://91.208.177.20/~jwh/ubnt/kernel/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon_info.c >> http://91.208.177.20/~jwh/ubnt/kernel/drivers/net/octeon/ethernet.c >> http://91.208.177.20/~jwh/ubnt/kernel/net/core/dev.c > > I think you're probably listing those files because they contain > 'ubnt', but alas they just contain some stuff related to device > naming. > Like most vendors I suspect they distribute code minus the private stuff >> I'm pretty sure their stock firmware also boots up with something along the >> lines of ath_ubnt_phy driver, will have to double check.. I think I have one >> left with stock firmware > > If you get any more information, that sounds like something that would > be useful. > I'll have a gander but the same string in their binary-only firmware isn't present in the GPL code. > Thanks, > Juli. If you have any tips on what I can experiment with, I'm happy to do that, I have a few ERLs Thanks, Joe