From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Jun 11 10:50: 5 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681D837B695
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id KAA30571;
	Sun, 11 Jun 2000 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200006111750.KAA30571@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net>
Subject: Re: kern/19192: patches to include specfs in LINT, modules
Reply-To: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR kern/19192; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: kern/19192: patches to include specfs in LINT, modules
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 10:49:35 -0700 (PDT)

 On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Bruce Evans wrote:
 
 > Actually, it is treated as non-optional code.
 > 
 > Bruce
 > 
 
   Ah, I see. I didn't grok that from the cvs log. I should have realized
 thought that with so many talented people working on the specfs code, such an
 oversight was unlikely. I have learned my lesson.
 
   Kelly
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message