From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 23 12:30:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBED0106566B for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD38FC18 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8NCUC9M002648 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:30:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p8NCUCbp002645; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:30:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:30:12 GMT Message-Id: <201109231230.p8NCUCbp002645@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Ralf van der Enden Cc: Subject: Re: ports/160539: [PATCH] security/botan: update to 1.10.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ralf van der Enden List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:30:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/160539; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf van der Enden To: Lapo Luchini Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/160539: [PATCH] security/botan: update to 1.10.1 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:27:57 +0200 Good afternoon Lapo, I've grabbed your patch for botan 1.10.1 from GNATS and after a little patching I got powerdns to work without too much of a hassle. PowerDNS already had support for earlier 1.9 versions, so the API only changed slightly. How could I synchronize my patch with yours ? I want to avoid having my changes commited before yours have. Cheers, Ralf van der Enden On 20-9-2011 11:30, Lapo Luchini wrote: > This patch renames the installed library (to include version) and thus > could be compatible with botan 1.8.11 if committed with a different port > name; but I wonder if 1.8 is really useful to keep around. > Dependencies are three: monotone, which I do maintain, and there is a > patch currently in test regarding that; what about the other two > dependencies? I added the two maintainers in Cc.