From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 28 07:48:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA17450 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 07:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from superior.mooseriver.com (ppp030-sm0.sirius.com [205.134.229.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA17445 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 07:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jgrosch@localhost) by superior.mooseriver.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id HAA01894; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 07:48:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Josef Grosch Message-Id: <199704281448.HAA01894@superior.mooseriver.com> Subject: Re: various questions In-Reply-To: <199704280903.CAA03430@implode.root.com> from David Greenman at "Apr 28, 97 02:03:29 am" To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 07:48:05 -0700 (PDT) Cc: jgrosch@sirius.com, kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de, dkeller@psln.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: jgrosch@sirius.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk David Greenman said: >>I use this card. Try the following in your kernel config file: >> >> device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 net irq 3 iomem 0xd8000 vector edintr >> ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > irq 3 is a poor choice since it conflicts with sio1 ("COM2"). > Yes, my mistake. I used IRQ 3 because that was the only hardware jumper the card had. The other IRQs had be set in software, if I remember right. I had to move the IRQ for sio1 from IRQ 3 to IRQ 10. I should have included that bit of information. Josef -- Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 2.2.1 jgrosch@sirius.com | Micro$oft free world | UNIX for the masses